Challenging the Wisdom of the Trans Texas Corridor.

comment on this page or topic  

  Research Resources

[ HOME ]

INDEX: Articles by Date

06.11.03  PPPs party-crash cosy electioneering

06.11.03  Unaccountable PPPs offer uneasy money

06.11.03  Exposed: Bracks' secret deals

06.11.03  Good deal or bad, secrecy keeps voters in the dark

06.11.01  Brumby vows less secrecy on big projects

06.10.30  Courting controversy over PPP report

 

A cop-out or good sense?

Tim Colebatch, November 3, 2006

What are public-private partnerships?

PPPs cover a wide range of contracts in which governments pay the private sector to finance, design, build and operate public infrastructure. The essential feature is that the private sector takes on the Government's responsibilities for a price.

For example?

CityLink. EastLink. The Southern Cross (formerly Spencer Street) station redevelopment. The new County Court building. The Showgrounds redevelopment. The new Royal Children's Hospital. The proposed rebuilding of rundown schools.

Why do governments want to hand these jobs to private developers?

The Victorian Government argues that it allows more projects to be built, encourages innovation, transfers risks (eg, of cost overruns) off the budget to the private sector and can lead to faster completion at lower cost. Critics see the heavy use of PPPs as driven by a fear of taking on significant debt, and hence being labelled by its opponents as financially irresponsible.

If the Government is right, then what's wrong with PPPs?

Critics question whether they really do provide value for money. In reality, cost overruns do end up being paid by governments (eg, at Southern Cross station). The private sector faces higher borrowing costs and must make profits on top of costs, while the whole process costs a fortune in consultants' fees and finance charges. A key issue in Victoria is the secrecy surrounding PPP contracts, which are largely treated as "commercial in confidence". The all-party Public Accounts and Estimates Committee has concluded that it is impossible for the public to know whether it is getting value for money because so little information is released.

What reforms are in train?

Treasurer John Brumby has promised to release more information in future. But critics want an independent inquiry into whether past PPPs have delivered value for money.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

FAIR USE NOTICE. This document may contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org is making this article available for academic research purposes in our non-commercial, non-profit, effort to advance the understanding of government accountability, civil liberties, citizen rights, social and environmental justice issues. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. CorridorWatch.org does not express or imply that CorridorWatch.org holds any claim of copyright on such material as may appear on this page.

This Page Last Updated: Friday January 26, 2007

CorridorWatch.org
2004-2007 CorridorWatch.org - All Rights Reserved.